If this is your take, why are you replying to me? I'm not arguing there is (or isn't) a shortage, I'm pushing back on a point premised on the existence of a sh

If this is your take, why are you replying to me? I'm not arguing there is (or isn't) a shortage, I'm pushing back on a point premised on the existence of a shortage. Go reply to that other guy. Your point seems to be that a shortage is not possible because carrier grade NAT. I'd argue that the deployment of carrier grade NAT is proof that one is actively in existence.