3 ms·
He is merely attacking the lone inventor myth. While it is good for putting names in the history books it is completely inadequate for actually deciding who inv
by antt 8y ago
He is merely attacking the lone inventor myth. While it is good for putting names in the history books it is completely inadequate for actually deciding who invented something.
Mathematics has the rule of thumb that anything named after someone was not discovered by them. It should equally well apply to all fields of human endeavour.
Until we get rid of that myth we will never figure out how creativity actually works.