3 ms·
> not necessarily safer either Rust version will not be safer if the authors did 10 times more errors per line than average C programmer.
by red75prime 8y ago
> not necessarily safer either
Rust version will not be safer if the authors did 10 times more errors per line than average C programmer.
- red75prime 8y agoRust version has 10% of lines marked as `unsafe`. Programmers need to make 10 times more errors per line to introduce the same number of errors that are considered unsafe in Rust (memory corruption, data races, double frees, deallocated memory usage). I'm not sure what's wrong with this statement.