I'm sure the LinkedIn title is more provocative, yet it seems to me that the other assertions including that "Sasqua failed to take even basic steps to protect

I'm sure the LinkedIn title is more provocative, yet it seems to me that the other assertions including that "Sasqua failed to take even basic steps to protect the secrecy of the information contained in its database" played a significant role in the court's decisions. It's hard to claim confidentiality when the company itself did not treat the information in a confidential manner nor did they follow even basic security principals.