6 ms·
Tilt Brush is comparable in that it has it need to work as ypu propose internally. And all it has to do is fill relatively small vertey buffers with geometry,
by gmueckl 8y ago
Tilt Brush is comparable in that it has it need to work as ypu propose internally. And all it has to do is fill relatively small vertey buffers with geometry, yet it takes forever to load a file.
I am not going to create a full model to estimate memory usage and of the different designs. It is however clear that a nondestructive approach is more computationally heavy in principle because it will always rerun the same operations more often than a destructive one. And all these times do add up. An operation that takes 100ms after a click or keypress is perceived as practically instant. But 100 of these take 10 seconds. And there are operations in Photoshop that a lot longer than that.
- chongli 8y agoWhat you say is all true, but I think it is still worth a try. There are a lot of optimizations that Photoshop simply doesn't do. Its ancient code base leaves a ton of room for improvement with a fresh start. I don't know who you get to build this thing though. Maybe I will one day.
- gmueckl 8y agoHow do you know that Photoshop could be a lot faster than it is right now? I would not dare to make such a statement unless I have seen its current codebase.