4 ms·
The implication requires a further premise that the mind is reducible to the brain, which we do not know to be true.
by yters 8y ago
The implication requires a further premise that the mind is reducible to the brain, which we do not know to be true.
- feanaro 8y agoNot just the brain, but the whole body and, even more generally, to phenomena that can be described by physics. Unless you are trying to argue for a non-physical (i.e. magical) soul, the argument is sound.
- yters 8y agoRight, why assume the mind reduces to physics? This is usually how people argue for AGI being inevitable, but assuming the mind reduces to physics is a big assumption. Perhaps we have a physical soul.
- feanaro 8y agoWhy not? Everything so far had been reduced to physics; sometimes to at-the-time undiscovered physics.