6 ms·
Not sure if this helps, but we were evaluating Mattermost and are still evaluating Zulip at the moment. Our users pretty fast had a tendency towards Zulip, whil
by seedie 8y ago
Not sure if this helps, but we were evaluating Mattermost and are still evaluating Zulip at the moment. Our users pretty fast had a tendency towards Zulip, while I've had a slight preference for Mattermost from a ops view.
We only have/had a short eval phase and our use case is a small raceengineering team with 40 people at the racetrack, independent of internet access. So a very particualar use case, and our needs might not cover you needs.
Zulip pro
* Threading model (can't value that high enough)
* All messages overview, no matter what stream they were written in
* Zulip community at chat.zulip.org with direct contact to the devs. Tim Abbott the lead dev helped me out in a issue with a user login (haven't used the Mattermost support so can't compare)
Zulip con
* Most ops work has to be done by a python script manage.py, API has room to improve
Mattermost pro
* API
* haven't measured but the UI felt smoother, faster
Mattermost con
* you have to pay for Enterprise features
Both have great docs and a docker deployment