Doesn't the root comment come to the opposite conclusion, though? From its last paragraph: > Perhaps the real solution is to change the laws so that no one can

Doesn't the root comment come to the opposite conclusion, though? From its last paragraph: > Perhaps the real solution is to change the laws so that no one can legally take advantage of these loopholes, no matter how much money or resources they have. i.e. if a law was created with the supposition that in practice it would only apply to a certain subset of cases to which it could in theory, then change the law so that it is universally applicable. That being said, your "robots in the sky" scenario strikes me as a perfectly plausible example of a techno-dystopia we could create for ourselves far enough down that path.