4 ms·
If you're considering implementing a tagger, then I think this is a good paper to read for approaches that will improve your results in a developer time efficie
by syllogism 16y ago
If you're considering implementing a tagger, then I think this is a good paper to read for approaches that will improve your results in a developer time efficient way:
http://l2r.cs.uiuc.edu/~danr/Papers/RatinovRo09.pdf http://l2r.cs.uiuc.edu/~danr/Papers/RatinovRo09.pdf
- ogrisel 16y agoThanks for posting this: I read this paper some time ago but completely forgot the name of the authors. It is indeed a good "tricks of the trade" paper. I real enjoy such papers.
- syllogism 16y agoYeah, it's nice when a paper boils down a task into the best bang-for-buck approach you should take. A recent such paper I'm excited about is this one on coreference resolution from EMNLP 2010: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D/D10/D10-1048.pdf http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D/D10/D10-1048.pdf , by the Stanford group. It's a rule-based coreference resolution system you could implement in a couple of days that gets state-of-the-art results. Best of all it looks like you could get it to run about as fast as the parser that's backing it. I'm planning to write a version for the C&C parser.