This "analysis" is so much worse than what Wikipedia has: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wes_Anderson#Recurring_collaborators https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wes_

This "analysis" is so much worse than what Wikipedia has: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wes_Anderson#Recurring_collaborators https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wes_Anderson#Recurring_collabo... A table makes a lot more sense for this kind of content. The graph looks very messy and it's hard to get anything out of it quickly.