18 ms·
I'm convinced that a "None of the Others" mark is pretty essential to making any ranked system good. But we're talking a lot of complexity to have both ranks a
by quadrangle 8y ago
I'm convinced that a "None of the Others" mark is pretty essential to making any ranked system good.
But we're talking a lot of complexity to have both ranks and scores as separate marks. Super long ballot, will turn away most voters and seem really hard to process.
It sounds like you might appreciate 3-2-1 voting. https://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/3-2-1_voting https://wiki.electorama.com/wiki/3-2-1_voting
- tunesmith 8y agoIt wouldn't have to be both ranks and scores. It could just be scores. But you then order the scores numerically to infer the rank. And you use the rank to find the Condorcet Winner. If there is no CW, then you use the scores from the candidates in the Smith Set to identify the winner from that Smith Set. (The point of the above was to respect the Condorcet Criterion, and 3-2-1 voting does not meet that criterion.)