4 ms·

It only took him two hours after the feature request was posted until the change went live. I guess that kind of speed is only possible if you're a solo develop

by elaus 8y ago

It only took him two hours after the feature request was posted until the change went live. I guess that kind of speed is only possible if you're a solo developer that takes full responsibility for his product and who is product owner, dev-op, UX expert and QA all in one person.

sophistication 8y ago
Notably he was also answering other questions in the AMA, so it possibly only took him 2 minutes. It is not a difficult feature to implement anyhow, it probably went like this: vim tools/Text.js self.addEventListener('click', function (e) { if (e.detail === 3) { self.selectAll(); } }); :wq git add tools/Text.js git commit -m "Add triple click select all" git push origin master Done.
- mcintyre1994 8y ago
  Neat, I didn't know about detail on mouseclick events :)
- AltruisticGap 8y ago
  The main view is a canvas. Regardless, my hunch is event delegation would be more performant.
- IvanK_net 8y ago
  Almost ... but I use Notepad++ instead of Vim. And I had to implement the search for the first and the last character in a line according to the layout. It took me about 10 minutes :)
  - pwaivers 8y ago
    This is super interesting :). Just curious, why don't you use a more advanced code editor than Notepad++?
    - IvanK_net 8y ago
      Thanks :) I already discussed it here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15924664 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15924664
    - umvi 8y ago
      I'm always amazed when people ship cool software with what I judge to be crappy, obsolete, or even downright dangerous processes/practices. Yet even though I (by my own judgement) use superior processes and practices (VSCode + Git + CI pipelines, etc.), I haven't shipped anything nearly as cool. A few others that come to mind are KeePass/Dwarf Fortress (no formal VCS), and GRRM (uses WordStar 4.0 in DOS)
      - gammateam 8y ago
        He could have done this just as fast using GIT + CI. VSCode would have likely slowed him down with indexing, and he already knows where all his files are so there wouldn't be any gains from hopping around function declarations with the click of a mouse Although you didn't pinpoint a single process that was inferior, knowing when to break processes is part of the experience.
      - softawre 8y ago
        Maybe you spend too much time on processes, getting things right, and less time on actually shipping something useful?
      - yakovdk 8y ago
        I kind of put vscode in the same category as notepad++. Actually, as a text editor, I think N++ has some nice features that vscode doesn't (like macros, I think).
        williamdclt 8y ago
        VSCode definitely has macros :) I don't think there's much that notepad++ has but VSC doesn't
  - kakarot 8y ago
    Cool project. Playing around with it now and I love what I see. Must have been very fun learning about how to implement image filters and such along the way. Any particular reason you choose Notepad++ over a full-featured IDE for a project of this scope?
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
jancsika 8y ago
And because it's a webapp the user accesses the new feature by clicking "refresh." Compare that to building binaries for all supported platforms, testing, publishing, dripping down into Debian & Ubuntu, someone on Ubuntu-Based-Distro-#1377 reporting a dependency problem, someone old Debian complaining that their compiler is choking on a gl library under armv7l, etc.
- analogmemory 8y ago
  In the same vein, someone says it's not working for them in WinXP IE 8
- Nadya 8y ago
  Unless the user is using IE11. A perhaps not-so-modern but still a mainstream and typically supported browser. But if you're going to specify "old Debian" I think it would be fair to expect it to work on "old browsers" as well. But I think it would be silly to expect it to work in IE 5 anymore than some modern programs working in some old flavor of a Debian distro with outdated libraries. At some point, like people do with dated web browsers, developers need to tell users they need to update as the developer won't be supporting such outdated software anymore.

by elaus 8y ago

sophistication 8y ago

Notably he was also answering other questions in the AMA, so it possibly only took him 2 minutes. It is not a difficult feature to implement anyhow, it probably went like this: vim tools/Text.js self.addEventListener('click', function (e) { if (e.detail === 3) { self.selectAll(); } }); :wq git add tools/Text.js git commit -m "Add triple click select all" git push origin master Done.

mcintyre1994 8y ago
Neat, I didn't know about detail on mouseclick events :)
AltruisticGap 8y ago
The main view is a canvas. Regardless, my hunch is event delegation would be more performant.
IvanK_net 8y ago
Almost ... but I use Notepad++ instead of Vim. And I had to implement the search for the first and the last character in a line according to the layout. It took me about 10 minutes :)
- pwaivers 8y ago
  This is super interesting :). Just curious, why don't you use a more advanced code editor than Notepad++?
  - IvanK_net 8y ago
    Thanks :) I already discussed it here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15924664 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15924664
  - umvi 8y ago
    I'm always amazed when people ship cool software with what I judge to be crappy, obsolete, or even downright dangerous processes/practices. Yet even though I (by my own judgement) use superior processes and practices (VSCode + Git + CI pipelines, etc.), I haven't shipped anything nearly as cool. A few others that come to mind are KeePass/Dwarf Fortress (no formal VCS), and GRRM (uses WordStar 4.0 in DOS)
    - gammateam 8y ago
      He could have done this just as fast using GIT + CI. VSCode would have likely slowed him down with indexing, and he already knows where all his files are so there wouldn't be any gains from hopping around function declarations with the click of a mouse Although you didn't pinpoint a single process that was inferior, knowing when to break processes is part of the experience.
    - softawre 8y ago
      Maybe you spend too much time on processes, getting things right, and less time on actually shipping something useful?
    - yakovdk 8y ago
      I kind of put vscode in the same category as notepad++. Actually, as a text editor, I think N++ has some nice features that vscode doesn't (like macros, I think).
      - williamdclt 8y ago
        VSCode definitely has macros :) I don't think there's much that notepad++ has but VSC doesn't
- kakarot 8y ago
  Cool project. Playing around with it now and I love what I see. Must have been very fun learning about how to implement image filters and such along the way. Any particular reason you choose Notepad++ over a full-featured IDE for a project of this scope?

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]

jancsika 8y ago

And because it's a webapp the user accesses the new feature by clicking "refresh." Compare that to building binaries for all supported platforms, testing, publishing, dripping down into Debian & Ubuntu, someone on Ubuntu-Based-Distro-#1377 reporting a dependency problem, someone old Debian complaining that their compiler is choking on a gl library under armv7l, etc.

analogmemory 8y ago
In the same vein, someone says it's not working for them in WinXP IE 8
Nadya 8y ago
Unless the user is using IE11. A perhaps not-so-modern but still a mainstream and typically supported browser. But if you're going to specify "old Debian" I think it would be fair to expect it to work on "old browsers" as well. But I think it would be silly to expect it to work in IE 5 anymore than some modern programs working in some old flavor of a Debian distro with outdated libraries. At some point, like people do with dated web browsers, developers need to tell users they need to update as the developer won't be supporting such outdated software anymore.