3 ms·

> www.Photopea.com , which is an advanced image editor, that works in a web browser Free to use, not free software. I cannot imagine doing anything remotely Ph

by aw3c2 8y ago

> www.Photopea.com , which is an advanced image editor, that works in a web browser Free to use, not free software. I cannot imagine doing anything remotely Photoshop-related in a web browser... > There was about 1.5 millions of visitors in October Visitors do not equal users. If those were even 1% of that it would be impressive.

yread 8y ago
There is quite some MIT-licensed stuff here https://github.com/photopea?tab=repositories https://github.com/photopea?tab=repositories He says he opensourced about 30% of it.
- teddyh 8y ago
  This food contains 30% non-meat products! Vegans, rejoice!
throwawaylolx 8y ago
>I cannot imagine doing anything remotely Photoshop-related in a web browser... Really? They already made Lightroom in browser making use of WASM.
mackwerk 8y ago
> I cannot imagine doing anything remotely Photoshop-related in a web browser... I do that all the time, we might have different definitions of what photoshop-related is, but I often use pixlr.com to cut faces out of photos and put them on other things. I will check out his product
- batty_alex 8y ago
  > we might have different definitions of what photoshop-related is, but I often use pixlr.com to cut faces out of photos and put them on other things. This is a tiny fraction of what Photoshop does. Even back in the mid-2000s, when I was a graphics designer, I rarely used Photoshop for simple work like that. It would have been the equivalent of using a nail gun for a single nail to hang a photo frame. You could do it, but the $10 hammer in the shed will work just fine.
xs 8y ago
Been using Pixlr (a photoshop-like web browser app) for over 5 years now. Here's why. * It's free * It loads so much faster, and the interface is in my opinion just as responsive as photoshop. * It doesn't require 200+ Meg of space on my hard drive * I can use it wherever, on any computer that has an internet connection. * And it has all the features I need in a photo editing tool. The only drawback for me is that it was flash based and now I found a html5 version and I think I'm in love with Photopea now.

by aw3c2 8y ago

yread 8y ago

There is quite some MIT-licensed stuff here https://github.com/photopea?tab=repositories https://github.com/photopea?tab=repositories He says he opensourced about 30% of it.

teddyh 8y ago
This food contains 30% non-meat products! Vegans, rejoice!

throwawaylolx 8y ago

>I cannot imagine doing anything remotely Photoshop-related in a web browser... Really? They already made Lightroom in browser making use of WASM.

mackwerk 8y ago

> I cannot imagine doing anything remotely Photoshop-related in a web browser... I do that all the time, we might have different definitions of what photoshop-related is, but I often use pixlr.com to cut faces out of photos and put them on other things. I will check out his product

batty_alex 8y ago
> we might have different definitions of what photoshop-related is, but I often use pixlr.com to cut faces out of photos and put them on other things. This is a tiny fraction of what Photoshop does. Even back in the mid-2000s, when I was a graphics designer, I rarely used Photoshop for simple work like that. It would have been the equivalent of using a nail gun for a single nail to hang a photo frame. You could do it, but the $10 hammer in the shed will work just fine.

xs 8y ago

Been using Pixlr (a photoshop-like web browser app) for over 5 years now. Here's why. * It's free * It loads so much faster, and the interface is in my opinion just as responsive as photoshop. * It doesn't require 200+ Meg of space on my hard drive * I can use it wherever, on any computer that has an internet connection. * And it has all the features I need in a photo editing tool. The only drawback for me is that it was flash based and now I found a html5 version and I think I'm in love with Photopea now.