2 ms·
I dunno, the first one that comes up (http://www.iphoneporngrid.com/ http://www.iphoneporngrid.com/) doesn't use html5 (XHTML strict instead) and doesn't use th
by tibbon 16y ago
I dunno, the first one that comes up (http://www.iphoneporngrid.com/ http://www.iphoneporngrid.com/) doesn't use html5 (XHTML strict instead) and doesn't use the <video> tag. Just points to .mp4 files.
The second (mobile.mofosex.com) is all the way back on HTML 4.01 Transitional. It too doesn't use the <video> tag, and is just pushing m4v files.
The third, (XHTML 1.0 Transitional) is about the same.
In fact it took until the 7th result to get an HTML5 page (mobile.bangyoulater.com). Of course, it doesn't validate. http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://mobile.bangyoulater.com/&charset=(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0 http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://mobile.bangyoulater... Really sloppy coding imho. It doesn't use the video tag however.
In fact, I wasn't able to find a single thing on the first page of Google that was:
1) HTML5
2) Used HTML5 for its video
with a special bonus star for one that validated. Not a single one.