> I mean, if we're going to finally be able to switch it, why not switch to the best option instead of starting with the second worst and switching again later?

> I mean, if we're going to finally be able to switch it, why not switch to the best option instead of starting with the second worst and switching again later? Because that kind of lesser-of-two-evils incrementalist attitude is inherent to the first-past-the-post system we have now.