5 ms·
Our experience with the Google cost increase was similar. We were paying around $550/mo for the GMaps Platform pre-price-change. Over 80% of this cost was for d
by phirschybar 8y ago
Our experience with the Google cost increase was similar. We were paying around $550/mo for the GMaps Platform pre-price-change. Over 80% of this cost was for dynamic maps usage. The rest was for use of the Google Places API.
When I got the notification in May that the rates were increasing, I didn't take it that seriously. We have a profitable company and I would have been more than happy to pay Google twice their rate for the premium services they offer. Nobody ever expects a sudden rate increase to be more than 20%, 30% or 40%, right???!
It was in July that the gravity of the situation hit me. I was seeing tweets and articles lamenting the rate increase. I thought to myself "huh, I better check this out". I did some quick math using the new rate card and nearly had a heart attack! Our bill was estimated to be ~$14,500 and the CLOCK WAS TICKING. We were facing a 2600% rate increase and had only 2 months to figure out a game plan. Our business was on the line!
I immediately determined that we were eligible for bulk pricing. However, Google will not sell you the bulk rates directly. You have to contract with an authorized 3rd party (re-seller, basically) to get the rates. So, we found a reseller and locked in the bulk rates. That brought our estimate down to around $12,000/mo. Better, but still a huge shock.
The next step was optimization. There was no way for us to reduce dynamic maps usage because it is such a core part of our products. So, we cut off almost all of our Places API usage and started using other services. Our estimated bill was now down to $9,000.
That's where we are today. We just got our first full month bill. It was a huge hit to our business, wiping out a significant portion of our profitability.
To be frank, I am pissed about this. I was more than happy to pay Google far more than they were charging us. We were always under the impression that rates would increase one day. But, to force an increase of this magnitude with such a short amount of lead time is pretty f&^%ing sh*&$tty coming from a billion dollar giant.
We're starting to test other mapping services. I met with a team member from Mapbox last week and am planning on testing their platform in December. Their quote for our usage needs? $550/mo.
- lukeqsee 8y agoStadia Maps founder here. We'd be happy to discuss how we can meet your needs, as well, if you're interested. Feel free to reach-out directly: luke@stadiamaps.com.
- bad_user 8y agoGoing from $550 to $14,500 per month is totally unacceptable. This is exactly why I'll always be wary to depend on Google's services. And it isn't the first time they do this either. First they monopolize the market via cheap rates and branding, then they make it exorbitantly expensive.
- xfitm3 8y agoAmazon isn’t too far behind with that model.
- gamblor956 8y agoWhat are you referring to? Amazon's been pretty good about reducing the cost of AWS features over time.
- magduf 8y ago>Going from $550 to $14,500 per month is totally unacceptable. Wrong. It's completely acceptable. It's their business, and this is the risk you take when you make your business dependent on another business. >This is exactly why I'll always be wary to depend on Google's services. And it isn't the first time they do this either. >First they monopolize the market via cheap rates and branding, then they make it exorbitantly expensive. Google isn't the only company that does stuff like this. Almost any company would do this if they had the opportunity.
- abandonliberty 8y ago
- Moru 8y agoWe had a similar experience. The first notices from google said we would be below the free tier so no problems. Turns out we passed the free tier the first hours of the first day of the month. Needless to say we are moving away from all google services we have used, either setting up dedicated servers or paying some other company for the service. In the case of the maps it's much cheaper to pay for a dedicated server with 1 GBps bandwidth than to continue with google maps. And we can update the maps ourselves if something isn't up to date. So the openstreetmaps organisation might be happy at least :-)