3 ms·
For markings of such importance, you'd think they would have a standardized stencil. The video of the worker spray painting seems a little too nonchalant, poten
by symplee 8y ago
For markings of such importance, you'd think they would have a standardized stencil. The video of the worker spray painting seems a little too nonchalant, potentially opening the door to misreading.
And if standardized, there could even be a digital reader (like an OCR?) to tell others exactly what it means in the event of confusion or differing interpretation.
- notable_user 8y agoThere’s not many options for what it could be, so it’s pretty easy to figure out. The color is most important, with some additional info like utility (which are few and welol known) and width.
- symplee 8y agoI wonder how they factored in that red-green color blindness affects up to 8% of males. Should color really be the most important? Would be interesting to see what percentage of accidents are attributed to misreading a symbol vs a color vs anything else.
- mjevans 8y agoIt's probably old enough that they didn't. Plus as said elsewhere, where NOT to dig. If looking to intersect it someone who can see the color correctly will have to identify the location.
- xenadu02 8y agoThose markings are primarily useful for indicating where -not- to dig or trench; it often doesn't matter what the markings identify. If digging needs to intersect any of those areas it generally means doing it by hand.