>so why not ISP's? Because it has to effing stop somewhere, that's why. Sorry, but saying that giving government-granted telco monopolies[1] a right to censor

>so why not ISP's? Because it has to effing stop somewhere, that's why. Sorry, but saying that giving government-granted telco monopolies[1] a right to censor content is "in line with the first amendment" is the most bizzarre thing I've seen today. [1]Neither spectrum nor the right to lay down cables are a free market.