> It's unprovable that science is the best method to arrive at truth about the universe. One would have to constrain the definition of "the universe" to a taut

> It's unprovable that science is the best method to arrive at truth about the universe. One would have to constrain the definition of "the universe" to a tautological one in order for science, the careful use of rigorous empirical analysis, to be the best at investigating it. We use other forms of analysis to study different things, forms that may share some aspects with science, but aren't quite the same. Some things just aren't amenable to scientific study. The humanities, for instance.