3 ms·
> Who is supposed to issue this apology? Who was involved in the decision to fund SCO in their lawsuit against IBM over copyrights in Linux? I could stand to s
by TheRealDunkirk 8y ago
> Who is supposed to issue this apology?
Who was involved in the decision to fund SCO in their lawsuit against IBM over copyrights in Linux? I could stand to start with those people.
Next, round up all the people who paid for (and probably ghost-wrote) articles, in all the trade press, to persuade corporate America that Linux was a copyright-absorbing cancer?
I'll believe Microsoft "LOVES LINUX" when they announce Office365 for Ubuntu, and not a day before.
Yes, I'm bitter. I was very active in trying to get Linux more-widely accepted at my Fortune 250 in the 90's, and a bad-faith manager used the lawsuit, and the coverage of it, to stifle my efforts.
- unstuckdev 8y agoWhat lawsuit happened in the '90s? All I see on the Wikipedia page started in 2003. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO%E2%80%93Linux_disputes#Timeline_and_major_cases https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO%E2%80%93Linux_disputes#Tim... Are you sure it was a lawsuit and not the state of the still very new Linux in the '90s? From what I recall, Linux didn't have a good reputation before 2.6.