3 ms·
Yes, Apple is good at keeping their web stack good enough for "regular" web browsing but not feature full enough to compete with their native toolkits. And of c
by fabrice_d 8y ago
Yes, Apple is good at keeping their web stack good enough for "regular" web browsing but not feature full enough to compete with their native toolkits. And of course, doesn't allow alternative implementations of the web stack on their platform...
- JumpCrisscross 8y agoIsn’t there a security argument for limiting native APIs to apps from the App Store?
- kyriakos 8y agoTrue but for web apps you use the same way to give permissions to use your device sensors you would use for a native app. The only difference is that it doesn't pass through the app store review process and apple gets no cut for it.
- JumpCrisscross 8y ago> for web apps you use the same way to give permissions to use your device sensors you would use for a native app Which would mean any malicious site a user got tricked into visiting can access the native API. (Downloading an app is more deliberate than visiting a site and instinctively clicking to make the pop-up go away.) All I'm saying is there are non-financial reasons why an OS designer might sandbox websites from the native API.
- cft 8y agoThat will be irrelevant in 7 years (time horizon in the article) since Apples's device share will continue to dwindle relative to Android. It will be the same as the historical OSX/Windows ratio. They already signaled that by focusing on pushing up the price per phone versus the number of phones as their stock price driver.
- Terretta 8y agoArguing “market share” as a headcount instead of, say, disposable income share or % of mobile spend, is like arguing the 1% is irrelevant because they’re only 1 in 100.