4 ms·
nope the burden is on yours because apparently people do use them (proven by transactions from different addresses)
by arisAlexis 8y ago
nope the burden is on yours because apparently people do use them (proven by transactions from different addresses)
- village-idiot 8y agoThe only use case I’ve seen is to evade SEC IPO rules. I consider that worthless. Well, that and ponzi coins and exit scam coins. I also see post exit-scam coins still trading above 0, which just screams bubble to me.
- sonnyblarney 8y agoThe burden of usefulness is on those who present them as useful, not for others to demonstrate that they are not useful. That 'some people are using them' is not really validation of anything. If someone can explain why they are practical, give real world use cases, and demonstrate how they are already being used in a practical way, then that would make sense. Until them it's vapourtech.
- arisAlexis 8y agouseful = users don't overcomplicate things with personal views and bias. People use it end of story.
- ectospheno 8y agohttps://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)