Your comment is too short, information-free and only implicitly makes a point; it doesn't argue why this title would be sensationalized by the EFF. The article

Your comment is too short, information-free and only implicitly makes a point; it doesn't argue why this title would be sensationalized by the EFF. The article proposes that while "recently, developers of major browsers have started building tracking protections into their own products (...) Google Chrome, the largest browser in the world, has no built-in tracker blocker, nor has the company indicated any plans to build one. "Alphabet has a vested interest in helping track people and serve them ads, even when that puts the company at odds with its users. And that may explain why Chrome lacks real tracking protections." These two main points, regardless of whether you agree with them, are reflected in the title.