3 ms·
For many years, my stock answer to anyone who says that computers are "fast enough" or "more powerful than most people need" is that I will only be satisfied wh
by rladd 8y ago
For many years, my stock answer to anyone who says that computers are "fast enough" or "more powerful than most people need" is that I will only be satisfied when I can create photorealistic movies by talking to my machine.
The session could go something like this:
Create a scene: London docks, around 1919, mid-afternoon. There are a few ships being offloaded, crates stacked around, trucks and horse carts transporting freight.
<scene is created based on historical photos, ML readings of period books, etc.>
OK make it grimer, more soot on everything. And make the season wintertime. Add more stevedores. Ship in the foreground is red, weathered, and flying a German flag.
<changes are made to the scene>
OK pull back and add a pub on the right side of the screen. Let's make it dusk. Sun is setting. Get some good light spill when the door of the pub is opened.
<scene updates>
Let's work on the pub's sign. It's called the Red Swan. Make a sign carved in the shape of a swan, paint it red. Smaller, and let the wood show through where some of the paint is weathered away. Hang it over the door.
<scene updates>
etc.
This should all become possible eventually, and probably a lot sooner than many people think.
- manigandham 8y agoDefinitely not within the 5-10 year timeframe that the article quotes though... if a computer can follow completely open-ended instructions that well in a decade then we'll be living in an entirely new world, and making movies will frankly be the least of our concerns.