3 ms·
It is. Read Sec 5.(d). It's not like people will be thrown in prison because their DB wasn't patched quickly enough. They have to knowingly and intentionally l
by thrmsforbfast 8y ago
It is. Read Sec 5.(d).
It's not like people will be thrown in prison because their DB wasn't patched quickly enough. They have to knowingly and intentionally lie to the federal government in an annual report.
- rhizome 8y agoThey have to knowingly and intentionally lie to the federal government in an annual report So it's a nonstarter, since the people being prosecuted for these things will have lawyers adept at whittling down intent to only the most brazen and malicious behavior. Not only that, but Sarbanes-Oxley showed us how effective "annual report" red lines are.
- thrmsforbfast 8y agoPerhaps. But that's not a compelling argument against this bill. Perfect enemy of better and all that.
- rhizome 8y agoI agree that the nirvana fallacy is implicated, but there were zero convictions under SarbOx, zero prosecutions even.