2 ms·
Not quite. Just have at least one branch (like master) where everyone agrees to never ever rewrite history. Rewriting history on feature branches that are alrea
by black-tea 8y ago
Not quite. Just have at least one branch (like master) where everyone agrees to never ever rewrite history. Rewriting history on feature branches that are already pushed is very useful.
Unless you decide that your git history is not worth maintaining. In that case only merge and commit and never force push. But git history is worth the extra effort to learn to rebase properly imo.