3 ms·
I think this example shows that the market has nothing to do with anything - it's people's perception that matters. It this particular case the dev won. I'll gi
by run4yourlives 19y ago
I think this example shows that the market has nothing to do with anything - it's people's perception that matters. It this particular case the dev won. I'll give you that most of the time it works the other way around.
Clearly, the poster underestimated her position and overestimated the dev's ability and that's what got her in trouble. With more knowledge, she could easily see that a django dev isn't worth 80K + 35%! In fact, I'm sure she'd get some bites (provided a solid idea) for the 35% alone from some very experienced people.
If the market did enforce the line, we wouldn't be having this discussion. :-)
- tptacek 19y agoI think we're agreed in principal and opposed semantically --- if drinko's position was better, a dev quitting wouldn't matter to her. Strong disagree that a Django dev isn't worth 80k+35%. Sure, I wouldn't pay anything close to that, but I have a mature thriving company. But on day 1, without the capital to contract the project out, that could be a totally fair deal. Am I totally wrong about how much Django devs make relative to PHP or Rails devs? Because my experience is they make more than 80k if they're good and have any business aptitude. They certainly get billed out higher than that.
- run4yourlives 19y agoNo, I think an 80K mark is good for a salary. What I disagree with is that a brand new startup should be hiring an 80K dev right out of the blocks like that. This startup needs a technical partner, not an employee, imo. So, you'd be looking at upwards of a 50% share with nowhere near that salary requirement. BTW - Billing rates rarely translate into salaries in any normal fashion. Two different markets, and the billing rate one tends to be much more inflationary.
- astrec 19y agoIndeed - a good Python dev is worth multiples more than than 80k. But we're talking cofounders here, no?