5 ms·
The idea of impeaching mods sounds interesting, but unworkable. How do you stop hostile communities from brigading and removing each other’s mods?
by berberous 8y ago
The idea of impeaching mods sounds interesting, but unworkable. How do you stop hostile communities from brigading and removing each other’s mods?
- HostFat 8y agoIt isn't a "democracy", votes have a different weight based on the past participation on the specific community sub.
- boramalper 8y agoI've asked: https://meta.getaether.net/t/how-do-you-stop-hostile-communities-from-brigading-and-removing-each-other-s-mods/70 https://meta.getaether.net/t/how-do-you-stop-hostile-communi...
- nemo44x 8y agoSome type of social credit system with power at the local and global level. Give active and creditable participants in a single community more authority there by giving more votes. Global credibility (you play nice in other communities) additionally is factored into the users ability to influence. Make this credit consumable. This way a community that wants to disrupt another will have to overspend and leave themselves vulnerable to destruction. MAD in essence.
- lostmsu 8y agoI wonder why can't one just pick mods for themselves. E.g. "subscribe" to a mod, meaning whatever that mod hides, you don't see. It could even be mutual.
- rolleiflex 8y agoThat’s exactly how it works. Default mods are just that, default.