Yes, and it's a shame because there's still plenty of value to be had from the article. It's obvious that the end comment from the reporter is untrue, since by

Yes, and it's a shame because there's still plenty of value to be had from the article. It's obvious that the end comment from the reporter is untrue, since by no definition could the workers be said to be becoming "AI experts" even if this is for some a step towards doing more challenging jobs. It feels like it could be a combination of the reporters lack of knowledge, sloppy phrasing and getting carried away withthe enthusiasm with the situation.