4 ms·

You call it legacy. Many people call it the code their businesses rely on. There is no need to rewrite it, god forbid. Instead, make it cross platform when pos

You call it legacy. Many people call it the code their businesses rely on. There is no need to rewrite it, god forbid. Instead, make it cross platform when possible, or exclude from shipping to other platforms. Then, instead of shipping a segregated .NET Core infant, MS could (and still can!) ship .NET 5.0.msi, .NET 5.0.dmg and .NET 5.0.deb/rpm distributives. Easy. No need to increase the amount of pain in this world. Just small, incremental, mindful steps towards the greater benefit of all living beings.

manigandham 8y ago
.NET framework isn't going anywhere. It'll be supported for years, if not decades, and will likely outlast many of the companies using it. What exactly is your concern? Just because you use the word "easy" doesn't mean it is. I'm sure the .NET dev team understands their platform and created a new runtime as the most viable option to get all the new features and flexibility of .NET Core.
- garganzol 8y ago
  >I'm sure the .NET dev team understands their platform They don't. People who initiated .NET Core are web devs. Good web devs. But they are million miles away from understanding the purpose, role and aim of the platform. The guys who really got it are Sir William Gates, Mr. Steve Ballmer and Mr. Anders Hejsberg, to name a few. They shifted to other interest areas unfortunately. Regarding the word "easy". Let's take a wider perspective. It should be easy for customers, right? There are a lot of them, say 10 million people. Making things easy is hard. So it gets hard for .NET dev team, say 50 people. The outcome: 10 million happy people, 50 people in pain. Let's take a look at the current .NET Core approach: kind of easy for 50 people in .NET dev team. But hard for 10 million of customers. The outcome: 50 happy people, 10 million people in pain. What outcome would you choose?

manigandham 8y ago

.NET framework isn't going anywhere. It'll be supported for years, if not decades, and will likely outlast many of the companies using it. What exactly is your concern? Just because you use the word "easy" doesn't mean it is. I'm sure the .NET dev team understands their platform and created a new runtime as the most viable option to get all the new features and flexibility of .NET Core.

garganzol 8y ago
>I'm sure the .NET dev team understands their platform They don't. People who initiated .NET Core are web devs. Good web devs. But they are million miles away from understanding the purpose, role and aim of the platform. The guys who really got it are Sir William Gates, Mr. Steve Ballmer and Mr. Anders Hejsberg, to name a few. They shifted to other interest areas unfortunately. Regarding the word "easy". Let's take a wider perspective. It should be easy for customers, right? There are a lot of them, say 10 million people. Making things easy is hard. So it gets hard for .NET dev team, say 50 people. The outcome: 10 million happy people, 50 people in pain. Let's take a look at the current .NET Core approach: kind of easy for 50 people in .NET dev team. But hard for 10 million of customers. The outcome: 50 happy people, 10 million people in pain. What outcome would you choose?