4 ms·
This article reads like 'I don't understand quaternions therefore they're bad.' Like what - they are the objectively best representation of rotations...
by andbberger 8y ago
This article reads like 'I don't understand quaternions therefore they're bad.'
Like what - they are the objectively best representation of rotations...
- eigenspace 8y agoThat's not at all what the author is saying. The author actually has a much deeper understanding of quaternions than most of their users and realizes that they are part of a much more general and useful structure known as the 3D geometric algebra and he advocates using that instead of quaternions. GA(3) use objects that are isomorphic to quaternions to represent rotations but is much more comprehensible and generalizable than quaternions.
- andbberger 8y agoOK sorry, that was rash of me to say.