3 ms·
> It did when you only had “do you have a cite for this” check my edit Oh gotcha, sorry about that. I edited my top-level comment fast, so I just assumed you
by jessriedel 8y ago
> It did when you only had “do you have a cite for this” check my edit
Oh gotcha, sorry about that. I edited my top-level comment fast, so I just assumed you hadn't had time to read the initial version.
> opioid agonism studies especially around addiction treatments where weak/partial agonists opioids are used to ease widthrawal symptoms without prolonging addiction.
OK, I spend 10 minutes Googling. I found a few authoritative lists of addictiveness that didn't seem to correlate with effective dose (which I am pretty confident is the measure of "power" being discussed in the article). And I couldn't find anything that asserted a reasonably robust correlation between effective dose size and addictiveness, whether mediated by agonism strength or otherwise. But I understand if you don't want to spend a bunch of time on this. Thanks.
- dogma1138 8y agoNow I understand what are you looking for no at the “effective” dose it likely won’t matter the problem is that effective dose is irrelevant in this case because we are talking about substance abuse. All full Mu receptors agonists can cause severe physical dependency, the stronger the affinity the more they also can push out other opioids and natural occurring ones and as over time the opioids can actually affect the “shape” of the receptor this is essentially what causes the addiction since what your body produces like endorphine is no longer good enough for you. So if this will be prescribed like fentanyl and other opioids this will be a problem the opioid epidemic didn’t happen because opioids were tightly prescribed and administered in controlled conditions it happened because you sprained your back and instead of some physiotherapy and a sauna you’ve been given a bottle of pills to chew on like candy.
- jessriedel 8y agoCool, thanks!