4 ms·
>> To try and shame people not to cite or use scholarly work from people with controversy sourrounding them is sinister in its very nature. It is falling to mob
by eiaoa 8y ago
>> To try and shame people not to cite or use scholarly work from people with controversy sourrounding them is sinister in its very nature. It is falling to mob rule instead of logic and reason.
> Then think of how much scientific inquiry has been discouraged because people don't want to work under those conditions.
That's an entirely different issue. What we're talking about here is work that exists, but is not cited due to it's authorship. If Adolf Hitler himself had correctly proven Goldbach's Conjecture, is the proof itself so inseparable from his other actions that it should be rejected with them?
- sp332 8y agoYes, that was a response to "Science should be subject to logic and reason" etc. To your hypothetical example, I think Hitler's reputation is pretty low right now and it's not necessary to deny him citations just so he won't get more cachet. Her article was about professors who are "jerks", "whose academic sexism hasn’t risen to the level of actionable correction".