3 ms·
People might remember Flickr for its communities, but I remember it for being a great archive of public photos. I have over 22,000 photos in my account — all o
by bad_user 8y ago
People might remember Flickr for its communities, but I remember it for being a great archive of public photos.
I have over 22,000 photos in my account — all of them privately shared with my family.
I'm a Pro user, however I only became a Pro thinking that if I stop paying, then the photos I uploaded will be safe from deletion. And I renewed my subscription right after SmugMug announced the acquisition, along with saying that they "don't have any plans to change free accounts". I guess that wasn't a reasonable expectation.
Unfortunately I might have to move off Flickr because it's not a safe storage for my photos. I guess that's the point of their upgrade, heh? They don't want archives, they want communities.
Except that for actually sharing photos with people, Facebook, Instagram, Google Photos are wildly more popular. Which makes Flickr just a forum with a slow interface.
---
I do understand the business reasons. If it keeps the lights on, then I guess it's better than the alternative.
But I'm also afraid that this will kill Flickr for good.
- baldfat 8y agoIf you continue with your Pro-Account you still get unlimited photo uploads and nothing is changing for you as long as you continue to be a pro-subscriber. I liked the way it was before. You keep all your latest 200 photos but the rest are in archive unless you pay for a pro-account. Personally I moved to Google Photos for all my photos backup and sharing. I have a personal server that has a backup of all my raw and high quality photos to keep.