3 ms·
I use Bulma (discussed at the end) for all my projects. It's very easy and quick to get started with, but I found myself diverging from this style when I was st
by Heliosmaster 8y ago
I use Bulma (discussed at the end) for all my projects. It's very easy and quick to get started with, but I found myself diverging from this style when I was starting to add new CSS of my own, to get the pages to look exactly how I wanted them.
And due to the lack of tooling, it's hard to refactor CSS (removing duplicate code, etc.) so I'm not sure how scalable it is to adhere to what the OP says for a long time.
- mahesh_rm 8y agoI never tried Tailwind, I landed to Bulma after using Bootstrap, and then Tachyons, for many years, and I really enjoy it. I find myself maintaining an helper.scss file with basic classes that bulma does not support out of the box, but other than that, it definitely saves me time and, overall, improves the outcomes.
- ealhad 8y agoTailwind is basically Tachyons + a bunch of features. Last time I migrated a project from Tachyons to Tailwind, it was quick and painless.
- jacobush 8y agoI used Bulma as a way of getting up to speed after a hiatus since circa 2001 when it comes to web stuff. I needed to quickly throw together a company site. I searched around and Bulma seemed ... "not insane" which was good enough for me. And it is good, and good enough. But I can easily see how you could start fighting against Bulma if you wanted to do much customizing. If I ever get caught between a rock and a hard place and need to do stuff not easily wrought in Bulma, I will check back on Tailwind.