That's true that I'm not a native English speaker but I still think that the whole article is extremely confusing. For example the author mentions multiple time

That's true that I'm not a native English speaker but I still think that the whole article is extremely confusing. For example the author mentions multiple times AJAX in connection with the downsides of a MPA, but AJAX is a technology used for updating a page without a page refresh, so really more inline with a SPA rather than a MPA. Things like this make this article very confusing. I am still not clear if the intention was to criticise: 1. The original article which was referred at the top 2. Criticise server side templating engines (but he didn't explain how a templating engine is different on the client) 3. MPA in general 4. AJAX (mentioned several times in connection with server side templating) 5. Anything which is not component based (since this is the final point in his conclusion) 6. A combination of those Which one was it according to your understanding (genuine question)?