> for the protection of morals that's the bit I don't agree with. it leaves room for a lot of interpretation. there was a woman in Austria who was fined for sa

> for the protection of morals that's the bit I don't agree with. it leaves room for a lot of interpretation. there was a woman in Austria who was fined for saying that mohamed was a child rapist (which you could argue it is true given that he slept with underaged girls). I don't agree to people being fined if they say something about Mohamed or God. That is not free speech IMO.