4 ms·
No offense, but it sounds like you are not a native English speaker and had difficulty interpreting the article. It's not very clearly written, but it's not as
by aardshark 8y ago
No offense, but it sounds like you are not a native English speaker and had difficulty interpreting the article. It's not very clearly written, but it's not as incomprehensible as you make it out to be.
- andybak 8y agoI'm a native English speaker and most of the criticisms above are valid.
- dustinmoris 8y agoThat's true that I'm not a native English speaker but I still think that the whole article is extremely confusing. For example the author mentions multiple times AJAX in connection with the downsides of a MPA, but AJAX is a technology used for updating a page without a page refresh, so really more inline with a SPA rather than a MPA. Things like this make this article very confusing. I am still not clear if the intention was to criticise: 1. The original article which was referred at the top 2. Criticise server side templating engines (but he didn't explain how a templating engine is different on the client) 3. MPA in general 4. AJAX (mentioned several times in connection with server side templating) 5. Anything which is not component based (since this is the final point in his conclusion) 6. A combination of those Which one was it according to your understanding (genuine question)?