3 ms·

I think you're misunderstanding the OP's complaint. It's not that streets aren't repeatedly labelled. In fact your before had multiple labels. It's that sometim

I think you're misunderstanding the OP's complaint. It's not that streets aren't repeatedly labelled. In fact your before had multiple labels. It's that sometimes google maps chooses not to label things at all until you zoom in more. Or sometimes out, strangely.

et-al 8y ago
Here an example to illustrate jldugger's point: https://imgur.com/a/hCo3V2X https://imgur.com/a/hCo3V2X You struggle to locate the names of the streets--in their absence, Google Maps shoves a bunch of unsolicited retail venues in your face.
- gregknicholson 8y ago
  > You struggle to locate the names of the streets--in their absence, Google Maps shoves a bunch of unsolicited retail venues in your face. Remember, Google's an ad company; think of it from their perspective. Google wants to push users towards businesses that advertise with them, so that business continue giving Google money and data. Users are used to working around crap software, so they're unlikely to stop using Google Maps enough to harm Google's business. So why would Google do anything to improve Google Maps for users if it even slightly harms their core advertising business? Their goal isn't to make the best map; it's to make money (by running a map service).
- logicallee 8y ago
  >Here an example to illustrate jldugger's point: >https://imgur.com/a/hCo3V2X https://imgur.com/a/hCo3V2X Do you think those example would be too cluttered if the street names continously repeated their own name the way I showed: https://imgur.com/a/xQiF6pm https://imgur.com/a/xQiF6pm (Perhaps in light grey, perhaps spaced slightly more apart.) ?
FabHK 8y ago
Funny thing is, as far as I can tell, logicallee is not misunderstanding OP's complaint, he is subscribing to it and substantiating it. Some people, among them apparently map makers, argue that "users don't want too many labels". logicallee is arguing that it's virtually impossible to put too many labels (by putting in as many labels as possible and showing that it's perfectly legible, and totally fine functionally, even if it's not the most aesthetic experience). FWIW, I subscribe to OP, that it's infuriating not to have streets labeled, and find logicallee's point rather convincing, that having more labels doesn't really distract from the functionality of the map (and I don't care that it affects the map's "beauty").

et-al 8y ago

Here an example to illustrate jldugger's point: https://imgur.com/a/hCo3V2X https://imgur.com/a/hCo3V2X You struggle to locate the names of the streets--in their absence, Google Maps shoves a bunch of unsolicited retail venues in your face.

gregknicholson 8y ago
> You struggle to locate the names of the streets--in their absence, Google Maps shoves a bunch of unsolicited retail venues in your face. Remember, Google's an ad company; think of it from their perspective. Google wants to push users towards businesses that advertise with them, so that business continue giving Google money and data. Users are used to working around crap software, so they're unlikely to stop using Google Maps enough to harm Google's business. So why would Google do anything to improve Google Maps for users if it even slightly harms their core advertising business? Their goal isn't to make the best map; it's to make money (by running a map service).
logicallee 8y ago
>Here an example to illustrate jldugger's point: >https://imgur.com/a/hCo3V2X https://imgur.com/a/hCo3V2X Do you think those example would be too cluttered if the street names continously repeated their own name the way I showed: https://imgur.com/a/xQiF6pm https://imgur.com/a/xQiF6pm (Perhaps in light grey, perhaps spaced slightly more apart.) ?

FabHK 8y ago

Funny thing is, as far as I can tell, logicallee is not misunderstanding OP's complaint, he is subscribing to it and substantiating it. Some people, among them apparently map makers, argue that "users don't want too many labels". logicallee is arguing that it's virtually impossible to put too many labels (by putting in as many labels as possible and showing that it's perfectly legible, and totally fine functionally, even if it's not the most aesthetic experience). FWIW, I subscribe to OP, that it's infuriating not to have streets labeled, and find logicallee's point rather convincing, that having more labels doesn't really distract from the functionality of the map (and I don't care that it affects the map's "beauty").