3 ms·
>Well, if this was not the Ai age, I would probably agree with you. But now we have super resolution and this papers can serve as a warning that now someone can
by romwell 8y ago
>Well, if this was not the Ai age, I would probably agree with you. But now we have super resolution and this papers can serve as a warning that now someone can recover the image, enhance it and use as evidence.
What does Ai have to do with this? AI can't create lost data. If you zoom in on Facebook pics and don't see anything, there's not much that can be done.
On the other hand, if you ever tried taking a close-up of anyone ever, this wouldn't be a surprise.
- rland 8y agoAs far as "using it as evidence..." The secret is that your "AI" doesn't actually need to create lost data. All you have to do is qualify yourself as an expert witness in Artificial Intelligence, and then you can say that your AI (which, let's be real, is a huge black box whose internal workings are a mystery to anybody) has identified X suspect in an image of y extracted from the scene with a Z probability score. Fill in X with the appropriate suspect at your discretion. (This already happens, athough not with imaging yet: https://www.propublica.org/article/where-traditional-dna-testing-fails-algorithms-take-over https://www.propublica.org/article/where-traditional-dna-tes...)