A step in the right direction, but it's not quite there yet. From the article > It would still require individuals to bring their cases before the Supreme Cou

A step in the right direction, but it's not quite there yet. From the article > It would still require individuals to bring their cases before the Supreme Court before the judges can rule whether their case is constitutional, which is still a little different to having the absolute freedom to consume marijuana across the country. It's also non-commercial use, which makes me think that the situation would be akin to Washington D.C. where it's legal to consume it, but not to sell it.