3 ms·
Could you explain how the term does not apply? Its meaning seems to be: "to impose upon another's generosity or hospitality without sharing in the cost or respo
by xphx 8y ago
Could you explain how the term does not apply? Its meaning seems to be: "to impose upon another's generosity or hospitality without sharing in the cost or responsibility involved".
- dragonwriter 8y agoFree software users are voluntarily given use of the software with only specified conditional responsibilities; them using the software and not taking on additional responsibilities is not an imposition of any kind, and not freeloading.
- xphx 8y agoIsn't that the same as when someone offers me a couch to surf and a kitchen to use? Sure, it's unconditional and I'm not violating any agreement, but if I use their stuff and don't give anything back, am I not a freeloader?
- dllthomas 8y agoBut in that case, you are taking up space on their couch and eating their food - their resources are diminished by your use of them. That's not the case here. I think "free-rider" is probably a better choice of term.