> It seems like it is to me, it's just extremely protective of the source code owner's rights. And you'd be mistaken. It isn't open source because (among other

> It seems like it is to me, it's just extremely protective of the source code owner's rights. And you'd be mistaken. It isn't open source because (among other reasons) it discriminates based on your purpose for using the software. This tickles freedom zero of the free software definition and point six of the open source definition.