3 ms·
Yes. First point is it's culturally less obtuse because it's a western frame of reference. Second, it's historic fact. More interestingly, they adapted the tool
by contingencies 8y ago
Yes. First point is it's culturally less obtuse because it's a western frame of reference. Second, it's historic fact. More interestingly, they adapted the tools toward peaceful uses making carrying them frowned upon in public. While the same has been considered before for guns, eg. a smart gun which only chambers a round or fires when in a designated recreational shooting zone, time or season, or when pointing in the right direction, etc. ... the reality is that clawing 100s of 1000s of firearms out of the general US public is not going to happen.
- CapitalistCartr 8y agoThe USA has on the high side of 300 million privately held guns.
- contingencies 8y agoHaha, hundreds of millions then. And I guess that's just the registered ones...
- solidsnack9000 8y agoIn light of that statistic, maybe civilian gun ownership is just not that dangerous after all.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]