4 ms·
We could afford all of these things, but for inefficiencies in the system. Calling human individuals with similar heritages by monikers of worst and best is a
by inscionent 8y ago
We could afford all of these things, but for inefficiencies in the system.
Calling human individuals with similar heritages by monikers of worst and best is a gross overgeneralization.
The obvious solution is, there isn't one.
- tomp 8y ago> gross overgeneralization Yeah I know that's why I put it in quotes. But that's how they're commonly perceived in media and academic institutions.
- inscionent 8y agoHow is that a justification for reiterating the falsehood that one nationality is inherently inferior to others? I prefer to not use hateful rhetoric even if the "media" does it.
- abakker 8y agoI suppose it is possible that many people find a system with some inefficiency to be practically nicer, easier, and more functional than one with absolutely perfect utilization, allocation, and efficiency. efficiency in a systems problem is almost never easy, and it requires everyone who participates to put forth their fullest effort. It is telling to me that when people are unconstrained by space/cost/time, they don't tend to create extremely efficient situations, but in fact prefer those that intentionally less so.
- inscionent 8y agoIndividuals with power absolutely prefer an inefficient system. Arbitrage and gatekeeping ensure their power in the future.