4 ms·
> The basis of that entire argument is based on a false understanding of what JWTs are and how HTTP state transfer works. I don't even see why you believe this
by CiPHPerCoder 8y ago
> The basis of that entire argument is based on a false understanding of what JWTs are and how HTTP state transfer works.
I don't even see why you believe this to be the case. The article (and the follow-up) are both pretty clear about what the actual issue is.
Did you read them or just react to the headline?
- manigandham 8y agoIt seems you are overly defensive about an article that you agree in other comments is "not about JWTs" even though it is titled as such and talks about them at great length. I think you can also see from my other comments that I know what I'm talking about and my issue is the fact that * instead of discussing client/stateless vs client/server shared state*, this article spreads more misleading information about JWTs and sessions.