21 ms·
That was what first caught my eye as well, which would make it impossible. > The affected code must not only be released, it must be made available under the S
by aequitas 8y ago
That was what first caught my eye as well, which would make it impossible.
> The affected code must not only be released, it must be made available under the SSPL.
But I think it should be interpreted that if you modify the code (mongodb) under SSPL it should be distributed under the same license, like is normal for other open source licenses.
- cyphar 8y agoNo, while they don't have the AGPL section, the wording in section 13 is pretty clear: > you must make the Service Source Code available via network download to everyone at no charge, under the terms of this License. Now, this only applies if you've modified the source code. But being barred from the effective right (due to the requirement mentioned above) to use modified versions of software makes it obviously proprietary.