You're talking about a service that this company provides at no charge. No one is forcing anyone to use these services. If you don't like that, go somewhere e

You're talking about a service that this company provides at no charge. No one is forcing anyone to use these services. If you don't like that, go somewhere else. No one is holding a gun to your head and going "RUN JS OR I SHOOT!". Why do you assume that you, and the people you claim to be advocating for, are able to compel this entirely separate entity, making a decision it believes is best for the majority of it's customers, to do something that benefits you - a user of a service provided at no charge, and with absolutely no binding contract?