3 ms·
You don't have to. Scientists could be wrong, they can always be wrong. But even if there's just a 1% chance of human existence being threatened for something,
by alexandercrohde 8y ago
You don't have to. Scientists could be wrong, they can always be wrong.
But even if there's just a 1% chance of human existence being threatened for something, I'd err to the side of caution.
- monochromatic 8y agoIs it 1%? Where did that figure come from? What if it’s only 0.00000001%? Is it still worth erring on the side of caution when there are real costs to doing so?