3 ms·
I imagine most are absolutely true, I don't, for two reasons. (1) There is simply no agreement currently on what counts as harassment. (2) Anecdote: I've
by YorkshireSeason 8y ago
I imagine most are absolutely
true,
I don't, for two reasons.
(1) There is simply no agreement currently on what counts as harassment.
(2) Anecdote: I've been involved in investigating a sexual harassment claim at a previous employer, at it was absolutely and categorically and provably false.
turning into McCarthyism.
Too late. That ship has sailed a long time ago. The situation has gotten so out of hand, that recording all employee interaction might indeed be the only way forward.
- ryanmercer 8y ago>(1) There is simply no agreement currently on what counts as harassment. This is an absolutely fair observation. >The situation has gotten so out of hand, that recording all employee interaction might indeed be the only way forward. Yeah, I think something like bodycams is likely the most effective solution to the issue but then things get tricky for various industries, stuff like patient/client confidentiality laws, trade secrets, etc. Not to mention stuff like using the restroom, where sexual harassment could still take place. Then audio-only wouldn't cover miming explicit actions. It's certainly a problem with no easily actionable answer.